HOUSING DESIGN RESEARCH & HOUSING TYPOLOGIES
To assist public and private sector clients and better understand issues and opportunities related to housing design and development Arnold Mammarella, Architecture and Consulting brings substantial study and research into housing design approaches and housing typologies. Understanding formal aspects of “type” and how housing can be configured on land vertically as well as horizontally facilitates clarity of options for responding to housing needs in our community. It also provides a framework to consider the needs of the population for dwellings that can lead to more nuanced and diverse housing and livable environments.
Research and study over several decades contribute to a deeper appreciation of the need for more diverse solutions to housing whether at the land use planning level or at the building design level. This webpage is intended to provide housing research and typologies information practical for addressing both the housing crisis and the under emphasized area of housing design. Additional information will be added when available.
MEDIUM DENSITY INFILL HOUSING TYPES — BRIEF COMMENTARY AND A FEW EXAMPLES
Educational and planning tools can help cities thoughtfully facilitate increased urban density and pedestrian/transit friendly neighborhoods, while achieving greater access to housing variety and affordability. This may include inserting denser housing within or at the edges of residential districts, along urban corridors, or within commercial areas, but does not necessarily limit options to large apartment buildings.
The recent trend has been to split the housing market into a. single family low-density housing that is out of the reach of most urban and suburban dwellers, including young families, and b. high density apartment blocks. Blocky mid-rise wood frame buildings are becoming the norm, but they are often bland physical manifestations of maximizing the number of units that can be built on a lot within the building code designation, as well as, cheaply built additions to the urban fabric that limit most urban dwellers to 1 or 2 bedroom flats. These dwellings lack not just the space but also the amenities and character many dwellers seek. They frequently do little to increase the pedestrian quality of their immediate environment creating density without urbanity. This trend is quite limiting to the variety of housing and may forecast a further splitting of housing based on class as well as neighborhoods lacking in cohesive fabric.
While if carefully designed large, high-density projects can offer positive benefits, another option is to insert more medium density projects using cost-effective low rise construction that can be readily built (with proper zoning in place) and fit well into existing neighborhoods. Variations on townhouse and courtyard housing as well as smaller mixed use and loft/reuse structures show promise on infill sites. By studying the design and form housing types related to neighborhood lot sizes and patterns, cities can understand how to create better land use and zoning regulations that accommodate a broader range of residents, while creating a more dynamic and humane urban environment.
Medium density housing types that can fit well in single family and commercial neighborhoods while offering net densities of 18 to 30 dwelling units per acre. include courtyard, row house, and cluster (row-court/mini-lot, bungalow court, etc.) These types can 3 to 5 times the density of most single family zones and adapt to a variety of conditions suitable for urban, small town, and suburban settings. The quality of the housing stock would be significantly enhanced with increased housing variety provided if there was more attention to these “missing middle” densities.